Analisis Faktor Penghambat Guru dalam Pembelajaran Tematik di SD/MI

Authors

  • Nafizaturrrahmi Nafizaturrrahmi Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Indonesia
  • Shindy Lestari Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Indonesia
  • Mohammad Agung Rokhimawan Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta Indonesia
|

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v5i1.224

Keywords:

Teacher Difficulties, Obstacle Factors, Thematic Learning

Abstract

The research carried out aims to determine the inhibiting factors of teachers in thematic learning in elementary school. This type of research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The data collection technique used is a literature study. The result of the research analysis shows that at the planning stage teachers have difficulty in preparing syllabi and lesson plans according to the conditions and environment of students, teachers also find it difficult to prepare appropriate learning media in thematic learning. Meanwhile, at the implementation stage, the teacher had difficulty in adjusting the time allocation with learning and the demands of completing one learning in one meeting, this had an impact on the basic competency adjustment with learning material in half a day, it was difficult to synergize the delivery of objectives and apply a scientific approach to learning. So as to better understand the concepts and implementation of thematic learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alnashr, M.Sofyan. “Analisis Faktor Penghambat Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah dalam Pembelajaran Tematik (Studi Kasus di MI Al-Hikmah Kajen, Margoyoso, Pati)” Al-Ibtida: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI 5, No.2 (Oktober 30, 2018):191-204.https://doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v5i2.2959.

Amin, Muhammad Asri. 2013. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Nuansa Cendikia.

Amin, Solekhul. “Tinjauan Keunggulan dan Kelemahan Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 Tingkat SD/MI” Al-Bidayah:Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam 5, No. 2 (2013): 261-279. https://doi.org/1014421/al-bidayah.v5i2.124.

Fatikhin, Muhammad Kholisul dan M.Kristanto. “Keefektifan Model Quantum Teaching terhadap Hasil Belajar Tematik Integratif Peserta Didik Kelas IV MI”.Mimbar Sekolah Dasar 1, No.2 (Oktober 1, 2014):123-127. Https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v1i2.873.

Hasrawati. “Perangkat Pembelajaran Tematik di SD”.AULADUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. Vol.3, No.1 (June 2016).

Jason, M.Miller and friends. “Using Measures of Fit to Predict Beginning Teacher Retention”. The Elementary School Journal ,Vol.120,Number 3. Published online January 21,2020.

Krissandi, Apri Damai Sagita. “Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013”. Cakrawala Pendidikan, Oktober 2015, Th.XXXIV, No.3. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.7409.

Muhammad, Azamul Fadhly Noor. “Model Kepemimpinan Guru dalam Proses Pembelajaran di Kelas pada Jenjang SD/MI”. Al-Ibtida:Jurnal Pendidikan Guru MI, Vol.4, No.1, Juni 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24235/al.ibtida.snj.v4i1.1443Muskania, Ricka Tesi. “Analysis of Class Teacher Difficulties in Thematic Learning at Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Al-Ibtida: Jurmal Pendidikan Guru MI 6, No.2, 2019: 231-243.

Mulyadin. “Implementasi Kebijakan Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Kurikulum 2013 di SDN Kauman 1 Malang dan SD Muhammadiyah 1 Malang”. Jurnal Edutama, Vol.3, No.2, 2 Juli 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v3i2.35

Prasetyo, Teguh. “Pengembangan Perangkat Penilaian Hasil Belajar dalamPembelajaran Tematik Integratif Kelas V SD”. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 5(1), 2017. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpe

Prastowo, Andi.(2013).Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Tematik 2013. Yogyakarta: Diva Press

Saputro, Hengkang Bara dan Soeharto. “Pengembangan Media Komik Berbasisi Pendidikan Karakter pada Pembelajaran Tematik-Integratif Kelas IV SD”. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, Vol.3, No.1, 2015.

Setiawan, Deny dan Joni Sitorus. “Urgensi Tuntutan Profesionalisme dan Harapan menjadi Guru Berkarakter”. Cakrawala Pendidikan, Februari 2017, Th XXXVI, No.1.

Siswono, Tatag Yuli Eko dkk. “Pemberdayaan Guru dalam Pembelajaran Matematika untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SD”. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. Jilid 18, No.2, Desember 2012.

Suardi, Moh. 2015. Belajar dan Pembelajaran.Yogyakarta:Deepublish.

Sukiniarti. “Kendala Penerapan Pembelajaran Tematik di Kelas Rendah Sekolah Dasar”. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan 28, No.2 (Oktober 16,2014).https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.282.6

Suryana, Dadan. “Pengetahuan tentang Strategi Pembelajaran, Sikap, dan Motivasi Guru”. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan,jilid 9 No.2, Desember 2013.

Syaifuddin, Mohammad. “Impkementasi Pembelajaran Tematik di kelas 2 SD Negeri Demangan Yogyakarta. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah 2, No.2,2017:139-144.

Trianto. (2013). Desain Pengembangan Pembelajaran Tematik bagi Anak Usia Dini TK/RA & Anak Usia Awal SD/MI. Jakarta:Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-15

How to Cite

Nafizaturrrahmi, N., Lestari, S. ., & Rokhimawan, M. A. . (2022). Analisis Faktor Penghambat Guru dalam Pembelajaran Tematik di SD/MI. Attadrib: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 5(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.54069/attadrib.v5i1.224